Fake Boobs Of Indians

I. Prologue Notice to readers

The Conversion of St. Paul's
Caravaggio

I happened to tell several times this episode of my life to different people and I know very well that this story is not without its problems are those that experience of any narrative whatsoever.

Indeed, first, any experience human is experienced in the specific context of the person who lived it: personal, familial, social, historical, cultural, religious etc.. In this sense we can think that this experience, if given that it can also be experienced by others will not be experienced in a particular way, through a particular view, necessarily dependent on the whole context in which j have spoken above. That is to say that the alleged virtual wealth of experience, will be updated as items perceived by the particular sensitivity (whose components are cited contextual above) of that person.

Then comes the story of this experience. Here, again and again, the context mentioned above will interfere and the story will draw a selection in all the information transmitted. There will be a highlighting of certain elements at the same time that the exclusion of others, and this, only the effect of "natural" in this context, but it will be added for the particular discourse of the telling, at work in his narrative. In other words, what the author of this story is that the recipient retains most of all. What will opportunity again for a shaping experience that may well away more and more of it the one who lived.

Finally, we must care for him who receives such a story. And again, we can predict without being mistaken for a prophet, there will be a new selection (highlighting / shelving) among the information transmitted to simply match the personality of the reader or listener narrative. What does it retain? What he will report in turn to whom? Etc.. the chain goes on ... So we

might ask: but what is the open mouth of the risk of both strain? What good is telling, orally or in writing, which seems fully transferable? However, at the same time, is there any other human condition that the latter, are there many other possibilities out of the way through language and codes that can reduce, limit, supervision and training and meetings between people with all their communication problems that can interpret and distort?

Obviously this also applies to my eyes to the transmission of the Gospels, to hagiography, the "experiments mystics "and other pious stories that will not necessarily rule out scientistic prejudice because the domain of the irrational and not verifiable.